Coraline Movie Reviews



Release Date: Feb 06, 2009

Genre: AnimationFamily

Rating: (PG)

Watch Trailer Movie Reviews

User reviews on Coraline

  • 4
    Coraline is very good. It is a little on the kid side, but has what would be scary parts for little kids. It is cute, but I did not have a chance to see it in 3D. It was smart for them to put it in 3D for a certain amount of time, that way people would run for it, but afterwards, nobody is going to see it because they have already seen it. Coraline was okay and I could see it again.
  • 1
    This movie is completely inappropriate for children. The artistry is dark and ominous, and the theme is evil. There is also a scene with a character who is wearing nothing but a g-string and pasties. Older kids might like the movie, but there were small children in the theater who cried at a couple of particularly evil parts. Do not take your small children to this movie. It is a trick.
  • 1
    I really hate how my favorite movie is not even playing anywhere near 60 miles from where i live. Now i have to wait even longer to see my favorite movie. I am only upset because i was really looking foward to seeing this. If anyone else has seen it I would like to know how it is, if its similar to the book and if its worth being disappointed over. thank you.
  • 2
    One must appreciate all of the work and dedication the animators put into this film, however the actual story gets left out in the cold. Coraline starts off slowly and is rushed at the end. The 3D is not necessary, all it does is make the film gloomier and darker than it already is. Who was the target audience? Goth kids?
  • 5
    Remember it\'s PG! My adventurous daughter is almost 3 and her 7-year-old brother wanted to see it. I figured, it\'s made for kids and they both saw \"Nightmare Before Christmas\" unfazed. The 3-D animation was far better than ANY movie I have ever seen, and that\'s a lot! The story line was fabulous... unfortunately, due to my poor decision making, I had a frightened toddler and didn\'t see the end. My son did and so did my adult friend, both stating it was better than the first part, and I only missed the last 15 minutes... Right, when it started getting really good! The idea behind the story was quite gruesome, so if you have children you aren\'t sure about watching it, even after you\'ve seen it, take them to the matinee version. The lesson it teaches behind it is just. We\'ll purchase it and watch it when my daughter is asleep... of course, we\'ll need to wait a few years for that! Worth the 5 years of composition and I project a lot of awards for this film... without question!
  • 5
    Richard von Busack of and writes:
    Children who grew up with “The Nightmare Before Christmas” would be surprised to learn that it was once considered too frightening for children.
    Children under 5 might want to be elsewhere, but everyone else with a fanciful streak should love “Coraline,” a stop-motion animated masterpiece by “Nightmare” director, Henry Selick.
    Adapted from a Neil Gaiman book, the story contains elements from “Alice in Wonderland,” E.T.A. Hoffmann’s “The Nutcracker and the Mouse King”—and there’s a spot of help from Keats’ poem “La Belle Dame Sans Merci.” In 3-D (the format in which it must be seen), this is a fascinating and strangely beautiful tale.
    A bright-blue-haired Oregon girl discovers a magical portal and takes up a chimerical parallel existence just on the inside of her new house’s wall. Coraline, voiced by Dakota Fanning, could use some escape. Her blue hair is the sharpest color in a muddy landscape soaking in the worst of the spring rains. Coraline’s new house place is a pale-pink Victorian on the outskirts of Ashland. The plumbing is bad, and water bugs and centipedes wriggle out of the woodwork. Her parents work at home, drudges chained to their computer keyboards.
    Coraline pays some little attention to her neighbors, theatrical retirees who were likely drawn to Ashland by the Shakespeare Festival. In the basement apartment lives a pair of broken-down English burlesque artists (Jennifer Saunders and Dawn French). The ladies live with a horde of Scotties, most of whom are dead. The tenant above Coraline’s place is a bulgy Russian acrobat (Ian McShane). Nearby, a boisterous kid named Wybie roars around in the mud on a minibike. He’s adopted a beat-up stray cat. Coraline has little use for the boy and his pet.
    The discovery of a button-eyed doll begins the adventures. We saw this dolly at first before the title, autopsied and turned inside out in front of us by mechanical fingers made of sewing needles. Exploring her house, Coraline finds a locked crawl space. When she at last breaks through, she discovers a glowing blue tunnel. At its other end, her Other Parents are waiting for her. They’re sweet and attentive, and there are no dismal computers in sight. They load Coraline’s plate with cakes, flatter her and charm her and tend an animated garden of plants celebrating her existence. The only hitch is that this Other Mother and Other Father have shiny black Raggedy Ann–style buttons for eyes.
    Coraline’s help in the trouble to come is the skeptical feral cat, who goes as he pleases between worlds. The cat is voiced with lovely insinuation by Keith David. This spindly legged alley cat may represent the film’s tenderest animation. Selick captures the nerves, the mystery and the savageness of the animal. At one point, the Cat commits a calm act of violence, murdering a mouse with one snap of his jaws. It’s an echo of the single greatest moment in Rose McGowan’s acting career, her final scene in Selick’s “Monkeybone.” There, her silky catwoman Kitty proved she was as much cat as woman.
    The 3-D used here is not just a technical gimmick. If Selick has something in common with Tim Burton, it’s the Burton of Beetlejuice. Troubling changes of size occur in the fantasy world, in the same way that the zebra-striped demon Beetlejuice was sometimes man-size, sometimes a scuttling mouse. The revelation of the Other Mother’s true self comes with a startling change of size and proportion. Selick’s plays on both sides of the line between the uncanny and the cute; asymmetry, strange angles and disproportions rule the creatures in the fantasy world.
    Still, the flm’s tougher-minded side occurs in the real world. There’s a touch of weariness in the way Coraline’s real Mother deals with her dissatisfied daughter. After trying to talk her child into wearing a drab school uniform, she utters a toneless “Well, I tried.” (Her refusal to butter up the girl is exactly the way it happens in real life.)
    “Coraline” is girl-centric, and this may be deliberate. Perhaps it was the thousands of goth (or merely offbeat) girls out there who responded the most deeply to Skellington and Sally. The changing rapport between mom and daughter (as well as between the not-mom and daughter) makes this a very womanly tale. The men are off to the side in a power struggle between maiden, mother and very bad crone.
    Watching fairy-tale films, too often you’re tensed up, worrying that you will be fed a trite motto that will spoil the pleasure. Coraline has its moral, an Old Country one: Those who gorge us on sweets may not have our best interests at heart.
    But Coraline’s symbolism seems artful and troubling, rather than simple. As in the Grimm Brothers stories, there’s something very pagan in the film, something that doesn’t jibe with our feelings that good always defeats evil. Rather it insists that cleverness and a little treachery is always needed to save our skins.

Write a review for Coraline

Login to write review:

Roll Over stars and click to rate movie theater

Although updated daily, all theaters, movie show times, and movie listings should be independently verified with the movie theatre.
Contact for information or comments. Please read the Privacy Policy and terms of use. Enjoy the movie!
Copyright © 2016 Movie Times, Inc. Site Map | Google+